Friday, December 28, 2007

Global Warming vs Evolution
They, (they know who they are) can't have it both ways. If we (we know who we are) can't have our cake and eat it too, then neither can they.
If things happen over "millions of years", like something having to do with the beaks of finches, then shouldn't global warming follow suit? If the birds beaks changed after conditions affected them for 13 million years I think that the globe must have been being damaged long before hairspray cans burned holes in the ozone layer. Long before carbon footprints or vehicle emissions became a problem. If things take millions of years, then they take millions of years. Just a simple question from a simple dude...

2 comments:

rocker4christ23 said...

Good points right there. Merry Christmas to ya and have a nice New Year

Joshua "Doc" Wible said...

You're right, but "they" want it both ways, "we're" not supposed to acutally think about what "they" are saying. It's ok if one thing "they" say contradicts something else "they" say. Maybe it is "our" job to make these contradictions known.